The end of church?

 I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb (Revelation 21:22 )

I can’t remember the exact wording, who tweeted it or who they were quoting from, but it went something like this: ‘The church exists because of the presence of the Kingdom of God in the world’. And I immediately replied with something like this: ‘No. The church is the training ground for the Kingdom’. Then a day or so later I remembered this verse in Revelation. There is no temple in the city of God. How can that be? Is there no religion in the New Jerusalem? Surely we will still worship? This is what I think: the Kingdom does not exist to produce the church, but the church to help produce the Kingdom. The church is not a result of the Kingdom, rather the Kingdom should be a result of the church.

When the Kingdom of God comes fully, the church will be redundant. There will be no special place or time to worship, for all of life will be worship and every place will be sacred. There will be no priests or preachers – rather we will all be priests, and as for preaching, it will not be necessary. Religion, as a distinct department of life, will be dead. There will also be no politics and no government, except the government of the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb. We will be holy anarchists. I can’t wait – can you?

But how do we expect to get to this holy state, this ideal world, unless we start practising our ideals now? If the church’s true calling is to make itself redundant, shouldn’t we be working on that? And doesn’t that mean, for example, that we spend as much time on campaigning against food poverty, and for greater economic equality, as we do on handing out tins at foodbanks? Because actually the point of the church is not to make converts or members but to make disciples – and a disciple is someone who learns the ways of the Kingdom and practises them. And the purpose of God is not to create more and more churches, but to bring about the Kingdom: the transformation of this world. And politics is as much a way of effecting that as charity is, if not more.


About veronicazundel

I'm a professional writer, amateur mother, and churchless Mennonite (ie I don't have a Mennonite church to belong to any more and am currently sheltering with the Methodists). I live in north London with my husband and adult son. I'm a second generation refugee kid, and eat Marmite on matzo crackers every morning. I have an MA in Writing Poetry from the Poetry School/Newcastle University.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The end of church?

  1. Steve says:

    I think it is important that there will be no religion in heaven, but there will be faith, and there will be worship.

    The church should be working towards making itself redundant. Not because it is irrelevant, but because the faith and worship no longer need a location, a building, a dedicated community.

  2. oldwhine says:

    Absolutely. There is no religion in heaven, but there is faith, and there is worship.

    The church should be working to see itself redundant, not because (as so often) it is irrelevant, but because there is no longer a need for a centralised location or building, or professionals to tell people what to do.

    It worries me that people who seem unable to engage their faith without the church will find heaven a rather difficult place. Maybe they will have to organise their own church groups, with their own priests and structures, committees and hierarchies ….

    … Or maybe that is the other place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s